In continuation of update on  mosquito repellents developments and DEET
Now, Johns Hopkins scientists have discovered what it is in the bugs'  molecular makeup that enables citronellal (the aromatic liquid used in  lotions, sprays and candles) and DEET, to deter insects from landing and  feeding on you. A better understanding of these molecular-behavioral  links already is aiding the team's search for more effective repellants.  
Researchers claim that, three taste receptors on the insects' tongue and elsewhere are needed to  detect DEET. Citronellal detection is enabled by pore-like proteins  known as TRP (pronounced "trip") channels. When these molecular  receptors are activated by exposure to DEET or citronellal, they send  chemical messages to the insect brain, resulting in an aversion response.
"DEET has low potency and is not as long-lasting as desired, so finding the molecules in insects that detect repellents opens the door to identifying more effective repellents for combating insect-borne disease," says Craig Montell, Ph.D., a professor of biological chemistry and member of Johns Hopkins' Center for Sensory Biology.
As per the lead researcher, when a mosquito lands, it tastes your skin with its gustatory  receptors, before it bites. Researchers suggests that,  one of the  reasons DEET is relatively effective is that it causes avoidance  responses not only through the sense of smell but also through the sense  of taste.
The team filled feeding plates with high and low concentrations of  color-coded sugar water (red and blue dyes added to the sugar), allowing  the flies to feed at will and taking note of what they ate by the color  of their stomachs: red, blue or purple (a combination of red and blue).  Wild-type (normal) flies preferred the more sugary water to the less  sugary water in the absence of DEET. When various concentrations of DEET  were mixed in with the more sugary water, the flies preferred the less  sugary water, almost always avoiding the DEET-laced sugar water.Flies  that were genetically engineered to have abnormalities in three  different taste receptors showed no aversion to the DEET-infused sugar  water, indicating the receptors were necessary to detect DEET. 
"We found that the insects were exquisitely sensitive to even tiny concentrations of DEET through the sense of taste," Montell reports. "Levels of DEET as low as five hundredths of a percent reduced feeding behavior."
To add to the evidence that three taste receptors (Gr66a, Gr33a and  Gr32a) are required for DEET detection, the team attached recording  electrodes to tiny taste hairs (sensilla) on the fly tongue and measured  the taste-induced spikes of electrical activity resulting from nerve  cells responding to DEET. Consistent with the feeding studies,  DEET-induced activity was profoundly reduced in flies with abnormal or  mutated versions of Gr66a, Gr33a, and Gr32a. 
In the second study,  Montell and colleagues focused on the repellent citronellal. To measure  repulsion to the vapors it emits, they applied the botanical compound  to the inside bottom of one of the two connected test tubes, and  introduced about 100 flies into the tubes. After a while, the team  counted the flies in the two tubes. As expected, the flies avoided  citronellal. 
The researchers identified two distinct types of  cell surface channels that are required in olfactory neurons for  avoiding citronellal vapor. The channels let calcium and other small,  charged molecules into cells in response to citronellal. One type of  channel, called Or83b, was known to be required for avoiding DEET. The  second type is a TRP channel. 
The team tested flies with mutated  versions of 11 different insect TRP channels. The responses of 10 were  indistinguishable from wild-type flies. However, the repellent reaction  to citronellal was reduced greatly in flies lacking TRPA1. Loss of  either Or83b or TRPA1 resulted in avoidance of citronellal vapor.
The  team then "mosquito-ized" the fruit flies by putting into them the gene  that makes the mosquito TRP channel (TRPA1) and found that the mosquito  TRPA1 substituted for the fly TRPA1. Researchers found that the mosquito-version of TRPA1 was directly activated by citronellal. Montell's lab and others have tallied 28 TRP channels in mammals and 13  in flies, broadening understanding about how animals detect a broad  range of sensory stimuli, including smells and tastes. 
Hop this discovery now raises the possibility of using TRP channels to find better insect repellents. 
2 : http://download.cell.com/neuron/pdf/PIIS0896627310005441.pdf?intermediate=true