Semaglutide shows sustained weight loss benefits in older adults

In continuation of my update on semaglutide

A new analysis of the STEP trails carried out by semaglutide manufacturer Novo Nordisk has analysed various trials to show the safety and efficacy of the obesity drug semaglutide in older adults (over 65 years), and found similar efficacy and safety as in the general trial populations . The study is by Prof Luca Busetto from the University of Padova in Italy and colleagues including from Novo Nordisk, who sponsor this new study.

Individuals of advanced age with obesity represent a vulnerable group, often presenting with comorbidities and frailty, and being at risk of adverse events (AEs). Information on the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists including semaglutide in this population is limited; therefore, the authors decided assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg in individuals aged 65 years and over.

The analysis pooled together data from the STEP 1, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 trials (only in people with obesity or overweight, not diabetes, because weight loss in obesity drug trials is always lower in people with diabetes than without – thus results cannot be compared or mixed). It included participants aged ≥65 years with body mass index of at least 30 kg/m², or at least 27 kg/m² and at least 1 obesity-related complication (without diabetes) who were randomised to receive semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo. All participants received lifestyle intervention and, in STEP 3, intensive behavioural therapy. Endpoints were assessed from baseline to week 68 and included percentage change in body weight; proportion of participants achieving categorical body weight reductions (≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20%); change in waist circumference; proportion of participants achieving waist to height ratio (WHtR) <0.53; shift in BMI category; and changes in cardiometabolic risk factors (glucose parameters, blood pressure, serum lipids and hs-CRP). Adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

Of the total population in the selected trials (N=4523), 358 participants (8%) were aged 65 years or older and included in the analysis (semaglutide 2.4 mg, n=248; placebo, n=110), with most (90%) being aged 65–74 years (and the others 75 years and over). Across the pooled semaglutide and placebo groups at baseline, mean age was 69 years, bodyweight was 99.0 kg, BMI was 36.6 kg/m² and waist circumference was 115 cm; 72% were female.

At week 68, there was a mean −15.4% change in body weight for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs −5.1% for placebo, and a mean −14.3 cm vs −6.0 cm change in waist circumference, respectively. Proportions of participants achieving body weight reduction thresholds in the semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo groups were 66.5% vs 15.5% (at least 10%), 46.8% vs 6.4% (at least 15%) and 28.6% vs 2.7% (at least 20%), respectively.

In the semaglutide 2.4 mg group, 11.3% achieved a WHtR <0.53, compared with 4.5% with placebo. A greater proportion of semaglutide-treated participants improved their BMI category from baseline to week 68 compared with placebo (see Figure full abstract). A BMI of <27 kg/m² (so called healthy weight) was achieved by 27.0% of participants in the semaglutide group vs 5.5% in the placebo group; and the proportion of elderly patients in the overweight and obesity class I, II and III categories all fell in the semaglutide group at week 68 due to the increase in participants who had reached a healthy weight.

For participants achieving both a BMI of 27 or less and a WHtR of <0.53 these values were 10.5% vs 2.7%, respectively. Greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors were observed with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo (see Table full abstract), including blood pressure, blood fats, cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c – a measure of blood sugar control used in diagnosis of diabetes).

Proportions of participants experiencing AEs and serious AEs in the semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo groups were similar for AEs overall (89.1% vs 84.5%), but higher for semaglutide re: serious AEs - 19.0% vs 12.7%, respectively. Constipation and dizziness rates (known side effects of this class of drug) were higher with semaglutide, while fractures and hypoglycaemia were comparable to placebo, both affecting less than 1% in each group.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semaglutide

Semaglutide shows sustained weight loss benefits in older adults

Oral Azacitidine Benefits Some Older Adults With AML

In continuation of my update on azacitidine 

For older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are in remission after chemotherapy, those receiving maintenance therapy with the oral formulation of azacitidine (CC-486) versus placebo had longer overall and relapse-free survival, according to a study published in the Dec. 24 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Andrew H. Wei, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., from Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, and colleagues conducted a phase 3 randomized trial of CC-486 as maintenance therapy for patients with AML in first remission after intensive chemotherapy. A total of 472 patients aged 55 years and older who were in complete remission and were not candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either CC-486 or placebo once daily for 14 days per 28-day cycle (238 and 234 patients, respectively).

The researchers observed significantly longer median overall survival from the time of randomization with CC-486 versus placebo (24.7 versus 14.8 months). The corresponding median relapse-free survival was also significantly longer (10.2 versus 4.8 months). In most subgroups defined according to baseline characteristics, similar benefits of CC-486 were seen with respect to overall and relapse-free survival. During CC-486 treatment, overall health-related quality of life was preserved.

"Despite demonstrable survival advantages with CC-486 maintenance therapy, the risk of eventual relapse and death from AML remains problematic," the authors write. "Whether CC-486 may benefit patients with AML when it is used in other clinical contexts requires further investigation."

The study was funded by Celgene (a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb), which manufactures azacitidine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azacitidine

Oral Azacitidine Benefits Some Older Adults With AML 

Coffee Consumption Does Not Affect Insulin Sensitivity

In continuation of my updates on coffee

Consumption of four cups of coffee daily does not impact insulin sensitivity, according to a study published online Dec. 31 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Derrick Johnston Alperet, from the National University of Singapore, and colleagues conducted a 24-week trial involving 126 overweight, non-insulin-sensitive adults aged 35 to 69 years. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either four cups of instant regular coffee or four cups of a placebo beverage per day (62 and 64 in each group, respectively). The amount of glucose metabolized per kilogram of body weight per minute (Mbw) was measured as the primary outcome.

The researchers observed no significant change in insulin sensitivity with coffee consumption versus placebo (percentage mean difference in Mbw, 4.0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], −8.3 to 18.0 percent; P = 0.53). In addition, there were no between-group differences during 24 weeks of the intervention in fasting plasma glucose or biological mediators of insulin resistance such as plasma adiponectin. Compared with participants in the placebo arm, those in the coffee arm experienced a loss of fat mass (−3.7 percent; 95 percent CI, −6.3 to −1.1 percent; P = 0.006) and a reduction in urinary creatinine concentrations (−21.2 percent; 95 percent CI, −31.4 to −9.5 percent; P = 0.001).

• "Coffee consumption was associated with a modest loss in body fat mass compared with the placebo beverage, and this potential impact on adiposity warrants confirmation in additional trials," the authors write.

https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ajcn/nqz306/5686860?redirectedFrom=fulltext