Monday, July 15, 2013
Abiraterone: Hint of considerable added benefit for patients with metastatic prostate cancer
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Positive phase II clinical results of abiraterone (for advanced prostate cancer)....
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Sun Pharma Announces FDA Approval of Yonsa (abiraterone acetate) to Treat Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
“We are pleased to add Yonsa to our growing oncology portfolio and continue to deliver on Sun Pharma’s commitment for enhanced patient access to innovative cancer therapies,” said Abhay Gandhi, CEO - North America, Sun Pharma.
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
FDA approves new targeted therapy to treat men with advanced prostate cancer..
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Abiraterone acetate can help eliminate prostate tumors
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Abiraterone improves outcomes for prostate cancer prior to chemo
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
For advanced prostate cancer, new drug slows disease
"This drug extended lives and gave patients more time when they weren't experiencing significant pain from the disease,'' said the principal.....
For advanced prostate cancer, new drug slows disease
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Golden age of prostate cancer treatment hailed as fourth drug in two years extends life
"What we're seeing now is an unprecedented period of success for prostate cancer research, with four new drugs shown to extend life in major clinical trials in just two years, and several others showing promise. It truly is a golden age for prostate cancer drug discovery and development" claims Prof. Martin Gore....
Friday, June 29, 2012
Advanced Prostate Cancer Drug May Help at Earlier Stage
Thursday, February 12, 2026
Niraparib Plus AAP Improves Survival in mCSPC With HRR Gene Alterations
In continuation of my update on Niraparib
For patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations, the addition of niraparib to abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) is beneficial, according to a study published online Oct. 7 in Nature Medicine.
Gerhardt Attard, M.D., Ph.D., from University College London, and colleagues conducted a double-blind trial that evaluated combining niraparib with AAP versus placebo and AAP in mCSPC with HRR gene alterations. A total of 696 patients were randomly assigned to niraparib or placebo (348 each).
Of the patients, 56 percent had BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations and 78 percent had high-volume metastases. The researchers first observed significant improvement in radiographic progression-free survival in the BRCA subgroup (median not reached at the time of analysis for the niraparib and AAP group versus 26 months for the AAP group; hazard ratio, 0.52). Significant improvement was also seen in the intention-to-treat population (hazard ratio, 0.63). For overall survival, the data were immature but favored niraparib. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 75 and 59 percent in the niraparib and placebo groups, respectively; in the niraparib and AAP group, the most frequent adverse event was anemia (29 percent), with 25 percent of patients needing a blood transfusion.
"For cancers with a mutation in one of the eligible HRR genes, where niraparib has been approved, a doctor should consider a discussion that balances the risks of side effects against the clear benefit to delaying disease growth and worsening symptoms," Attard said in a statement.
Several authors disclosed ties to the biopharmaceutical industry, including Johnson & Johnson, which funded the study.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niraparib



